Why We Should Consider Laser Hair… (2024)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100545 ·

Journal: Sexual Medicine, 2022, №5, p.100545-100545

Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)

Authors:

Nance Yuan
Alexandra Terris Feldman
Patrick Chin
Michael Zaliznyak
Susan Rabizadeh
Maurice M. Garcia

Abstract

Abstract<jats:sec>IntroductionPermanent genital hair removal is required before gender-affirming vaginoplasty to prevent hair-related complications. No previous studies have directly compared the relative efficacy, costs, and patient experiences with laser hair removal (LHR) vs electrolysis treatments. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight of medical devices is poorly understood and commonly misrepresented, adversely affecting patient care.</jats:sec><jats:sec>AimThis study compares treatment outcomes of electrolysis and LHR for genital hair removal and investigates FDA regulation of electrolysis and LHR devices.</jats:sec><jats:sec>MethodsPenile-inversion vaginoplasty and shallow-depth vaginoplasty patients completed surveys about their preoperative hair removal, including procedure type, number/frequency of sessions, cost, and discomfort. Publicly available FDA-review documents and databases were reviewed.</jats:sec><jats:sec>Main Outcomes MeasureCompared to electrolysis, LHR was associated with greater efficiency, decreased cost, decreased pain, and improved patient satisfaction.</jats:sec><jats:sec>ResultsOf 52 total (44 full-depth and 8 shallow-depth) vaginoplasty patients, 22 of 52 underwent electrolysis only, 15 of 52 underwent laser only, and 15 of 52 used both techniques. Compared to patients that underwent LHR only, patients that underwent only electrolysis required a significantly greater number of treatment sessions (mean 24.3 electrolysis vs 8.1 LHR sessions, P &lt; .01) and more frequent sessions (every 2.4 weeks for electrolysis vs 5.3 weeks for LHR, P &lt; .01) to complete treatment (defined as absence of re-growth over 2 months). Electrolysis sessions were significantly longer than LHR sessions (152 minutes vs 26 minutes, P &lt; .01). Total treatment costs for electrolysis ($5,161) were significantly greater than for laser ($981, P &lt; .01). Electrolysis was associated with greater pain and significantly increased need for pretreatment analgesia, which further contributed to higher net costs for treatment with electrolysis vs laser. Many LHR and electrolysis devices have been FDA-cleared for safety, but the FDA does not assess or compare clinical efficacy or efficiency.</jats:sec><jats:sec>Clinical ImplicationsFor patients with dark-pigmented hair, providers should consider LHR as the first-line treatment option for preoperative hair removal before gender-affirming vaginoplasty.</jats:sec><jats:sec>Strength and LimitationsThis is the first study to compare electrolysis and LHR for genital hair removal. The discussion addresses FDA review/oversight of devices, which is commonly misrepresented. Limitations include the survey format for data collection.</jats:sec><jats:sec>ConclusionWhen compared with electrolysis, LHR showed greater treatment efficiency (shorter and fewer treatment sessions to complete treatment), less pain, greater tolerability, and lower total cost. Our data suggests that, for patients with dark genital hair, providers should consider recommending laser as the first-line treatment for permanent genital hair removal before vaginoplasty.</jats:sec>

List of references

Buncamper, Surgical outcome after penile inversion vaginoplasty: a retrospective study of 475 transgender women, Plast Reconstr Surg, № 138, с. 999
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002684
Massie, Predictors of patient satisfaction and postoperative complications in penile inversion vaginoplasty, Plast Reconstr Surg, № 141, с. 911e
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004427
Garcia, Genital gender-affirming surgery for transgender patients, AUA Update Series, с. 43
Ginsberg, A potential role for the dermatologist in the physical transformation of transgender people: a survey of attitudes and practices within the transgender community, J Am Acad Dermatol, № 74, с. 303
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.013
Schardein, Management of vaginoplasty and phalloplasty complications, Urol Clin North Am, № 46, с. 605
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2019.07.012
Coleman, Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7, Int J Transgenderism, № 13, с. 165
https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2011.700873
Richards, Electrolysis: observations from 13 years and 140,000 hours of experience, J Am Acad Dermatol, № 33, с. 662
https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(95)91290-8
Görgü, Comparison of alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal, Dermatol Surg, № 26, с. 37
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99104.x
Marks, Excess hair, hair removal methods, and barriers to care in gender minority patients: a survey study, J Cosmet Dermatol, № 19, с. 1494
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13164
Harris, A comparative study of hair removal at an NHS hospital: luminette intense pulsed light versus electrolysis, J Dermatolog Treat, № 25, с. 169
https://doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2012.715239
Buffoli, The human hair: from anatomy to physiology, Int J Dermatol, № 53, с. 331
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12362
Fernandez, From flint razors to lasers: a timeline of hair removal methods, J Cosmet Dermatol, № 12, с. 153
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12021
Bowrin, Cost-effectiveness analyses using real-world data: an overview of the literature, J Med Econ, № 22, с. 545
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1588737
Mc Cord, The personalized medicine challenge: shifting to population health through real-world data, Int J Public Health, № 64, с. 1255
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01293-2
U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Real-World Evidence - What it is and what can it tell us?, FDA Sci Res Spec Top
Gupta, Skin typing: Fitzpatrick grading and others, Clin Dermatol, № 37, с. 430
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.07.010
Fayne, Laser and light treatments for hair reduction in fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI: a comprehensive review of the literature, Am J Clin Dermatol, № 19, с. 237
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-017-0316-7
U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Suchak, Postoperative trans women in sexual health clinics: managing common problems after vaginoplasty, J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, № 41, с. 245
https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101091
Chen, Overview of surgical techniques in gender-affirming genital surgery, Transl Androl Urol, № 8, с. 191
https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.06.19
Zhang, Laser hair removal for genital gender affirming surgery, Transl Androl Urol, № 5, с. 381
https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.03.27
Marks, Hair reduction for transgender persons: what dermatologists should know and how they can help, JAMA Dermatol, № 155, с. 525
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0149
Michel, Permanent hair removal with electrolysis, № 2, с. 145
Ramos-e-Silva, Hair removal, Clin Dermatol, № 19, с. 437
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-081X(01)00200-0
Reeves,, Hair removal.
Olsen, Methods of hair removal, J Am Acad Dermatol, № 40, с. 143
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70181-7
Liew, Unwanted body hair and its removal: a review, Dermatol Surg, № 25, с. 431
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08130.x
Draelos, Cosmetics: an overview, Curr Probl Dermatol, № 7, с. 45
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-0486(09)80017-3
U.S. Food and Drug Administration., Removing hair safely. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Ibrahimi, Laser hair removal, Dermatol Ther, № 24, с. 94
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01382.x
Wanitphakdeedecha, Physical means of treating unwanted hair, Dermatol Ther, № 21, с. 392
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00220.x
Lepselter, Biological and clinical aspects in laser hair removal, J Dermatolog Treat, № 15, с. 72
https://doi.org/10.1080/09546630310023152
Tierney, Laser hair removal pearls, J Cosmet Laser Ther, № 10, с. 17
https://doi.org/10.1080/14764170701817031
Sadighha, Meta-analysis of hair removal laser trials, Lasers Med Sci, № 24, с. 21
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0515-1
Nanni, A practical review of laser-assisted hair removal using the Q-switched Nd: YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers, Dermatol Surg, № 24, с. 1399
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb00022.x
Amin, Clinical comparison of four hair removal lasers and light sources, J Cosmet Laser Ther, № 8, с. 65
https://doi.org/10.1080/14764170600717902
Haak, Hair removal in hirsute women with normal testosterone levels: a randomized controlled trial of long-pulsed diode laser vs. intense pulsed light, Br J Dermatol, № 163, с. 1007
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10004.x
Gan, Laser hair removal: a review, Dermatol Surg, № 39, с. 823
https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12116
Haedersdal, Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004684.pub2
Haedersdal, Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, № 20, с. 9
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01327.x
Ross, Long-term clinical evaluation of hair clearance in darkly pigmented individuals using a novel diode1060nm wavelength with multiple treatment handpieces: a prospective analysis with modeling and histological findings, Lasers Surg Med, № 50, с. 893
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22943
Lim, A review of the adverse effects of laser hair removal, Lasers Med Sci, № 21, с. 121
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0377-y
Liew, Laser hair removal: guidelines for management, Am J Clin Dermatol, № 3, с. 107
https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200203020-00004
Ismail, Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial, Br J Dermatol, № 166, с. 317
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10695.x
Keller, Lasers in aesthetic surgery
https://doi.org/10.1055/b-002-51001
Battle, Advances in laser hair removal in skin of color, J Drugs Dermatol, № 10, с. 1235
Battle, Laser hair removal for darker skin types, с. 237
Dierickx, Permanent hair removal by normal-mode ruby laser, Arch Dermatol, № 134, с. 837
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.134.7.837
Lou, Prospective study of hair reduction by diode laser (800 nm) with long-term follow-up, Dermatol Surg, № 26, с. 428
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99260.x
Eremia, Laser hair removal with alexandrite versus diode laser using four treatment sessions: 1-year results, Dermatol Surg, № 27, с. 925
Chen, Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV, Australas J Dermatol, № 53, с. 186
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00879.x
Campos, Ruby laser hair removal: evaluation of long-term efficacy and side effects, Lasers Surg Med, № 26, с. 177
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(2000)26:2<177::AID-LSM8>3.0.CO;2-J
Grossman, Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses, J Am Acad Dermatol, № 35, с. 889
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90111-5
Grunewald, Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser, Lasers Surg Med, № 46, с. 13
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22185
Tuchayi, Is laser hair removal treatment permanent?, J Am Acad Dermatol, № 81, с. AB229
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.839
Salim, Gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty, Clin Plast Surg, № 45, с. 343
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.04.001
Hovenic, Laser hair reduction and removal, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, № 19, с. 325
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2011.04.002
Preston, Patient satisfaction with laser hair removal, J Cosmet Dermatol, № 2, с. 68
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00045.x
Sobanko, Topical anesthetics for dermatologic procedures: a review, Dermatol Surg, № 38, с. 709
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02271.x
Cohen, Pain management with a topical lidocaine and tetracaine 7%/7% cream with laser dermatologic procedures, J Drugs Dermatol, № 12, с. 986
Gonzales, Barriers to care among transgender and gender nonconforming adults, Milbank Q, № 95, с. 726
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12297
Koch, The cost of being transgender: where socio-economic status, global health care systems, and gender identity intersect, Psychol Sex, № 11, с. 103
Thoreson, Health insurance coverage of permanent hair removal in transgender and gender-minority patients, JAMA Dermatol, № 156, с. 561
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0480
Nanni, Optimizing treatment parameters for hair removal using a topical carbon-based solution and 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium:YAG laser energy, Arch Dermatol, № 133, с. 1546
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1997.03890480066009
Wheeland, Laser-assisted hair removal, Dermatol Clin, № 15, с. 469
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70455-1

Publications that cite this publication

Does method matter? Characterizing the effect of preoperative hair removal method on outcomes following penile inversion vaginoplasty

Lauren E. Berger, Christian X. Lava, Samuel S. Huffman, Daisy L. Spoer, Taylor Martin, Kenneth L. Fan, Gabriel A. Del Corral

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02059-z

2023, European Journal of Plastic Surgery, №6, p.1151-1159

Scopus

WoS

Number of citations	3
Number of works in the list of references	66
Journal indexed in Scopus	Yes
Journal indexed in Web of Science	Yes

2738	Psychiatry and Mental health
2802	Behavioral Neuroscience
2708	Dermatology
2743	Reproductive Medicine
2712	Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
2748	Urology
1310	Endocrinology